 |
| By Eric Smith --
The
Capital | | Our say: Background checks a vital safeguard in youth
sports By THE
CAPITAL EDITORIAL BOARD
THERE'S NO way for anxious parents, or for government
agencies, to guarantee absolute safety for children. All anyone can
do is use good sense, take reasonable precautions, and hope for the
best.
County Recreation and Parks Director Dennis Callahan came up with
a reasonable precaution five years ago, when he instituted voluntary
criminal background checks for youth league coaches - a process that
became mandatory in mid-2001.
Any
skepticism we had on the usefulness of this procedure vanished in
November 2001, when the county released the results of checks of
about 1,100 of the 4,000 head coaches. Twenty-two had criminal
convictions involving drug dealing, armed robbery or assault.
But, as our story last Sunday showed, the
system can only be pushed so far. While official coaches and
assistants are screened, it's up to the head coaches to submit the
names of those who work with the children.
Given the sheer size of the programs and the
turnover of coaches, it's impossible for the county to be
responsible for getting everyone screened. Youth recreation coaches
have a lot to do, and submitting paperwork on community volunteers,
to put it politely, might not seem like the highest priority.
This led to two unfortunate incidents in less
than a year. An assistant coach of a Harundale youth league soccer
team turned out to have a nine-year-old conviction for lewd and
lascivious acts with a child. More recently, the Gambrills Odenton
Recreation Council was put on probation for a year after it allowed
a man on the state sex offender registry to work with the
12-and-under baseball team.
There were no
allegations that the two men did anything wrong in their recent
contacts with the teams. But they should have been screened
out.
Of more than 10,000 volunteers
screened since the background checks became mandatory, fewer than 2
percent proved to have some sort of problem on their records.
That's far from alarming - but it does show
that the screening program serves a purpose, should be continued and
should be used by all coaches and recreational organizations. The
very existence of the screening probably deters pedophiles from
using a favorite strategy: working their way into youth sports
programs.
We're forced to use such
methods because the county, like most of America, has changed. Most
of us can't even remember living in the sort of community where
everyone knew everyone else. Most of us know very little about our
neighbors. So precautions must be taken.
And such precautions can only stretch so far.
As one parent pointed out in the Sunday story, screening
requirements are no substitute for personal parental involvement in
youth sports activities.
Next Opinion story Opinion Page Top Stories Page Subscribe
to The Capital
Published June 16, 2005, The Capital,
Annapolis, Md. Copyright © 2005 The Capital,
Annapolis, Md. |